The Real Cost of Manual Contract Review in M&A

M&A contract review is the process of systematically reading, analyzing, and summarizing every material contract in a target company's data room to identify risks, obligations, and deal-relevant provisions. It is the most labor-intensive phase of legal due diligence, and for most law firms, it is still done manually, one contract at a time.

The direct economics are straightforward. A mid-market data room contains roughly 300 contracts. Each contract takes an average of 45 minutes for initial review by an associate. That is 225 attorney hours, or approximately $112,500 at a blended associate rate of $500 per hour. But the direct review cost dramatically understates the true expense.

The Full Cost Breakdown

The 225-hour figure captures only the initial read-through. The complete contract review workflow includes several additional stages, each with its own time cost.

Initial review: 225 hours. Reading each contract and identifying relevant provisions. This is the baseline, and it assumes a single pass with no backtracking. In practice, attorneys frequently return to contracts as they develop pattern recognition across the data room.

Extraction and summarization: 75 hours. Pulling specific provision details (caps, baskets, termination triggers, consent requirements) into a structured format. This is where attorneys translate what they read into the data points that populate a diligence memo.

Issue tracking and categorization: 30 hours. Organizing identified issues by severity, document type, and deal relevance. Flagging items that need partner review. Cross-referencing findings across related contracts (e.g., confirming that an assignment restriction in a customer agreement aligns with the seller's representations about third-party consents).

Memo and deliverable drafting: 45 hours. Writing the diligence summary, populating disclosure schedules, preparing exception lists. Converting raw findings into the structured deliverables that the deal team and client will rely on.

Review cycles and revisions: 25 hours. Partner review, client feedback incorporation, and cross-referencing against the purchase agreement's representations and warranties. These cycles often uncover gaps that require associates to go back to the contracts.

Total: approximately 400 hours per transaction. At $500 per hour, that is $200,000 in direct attorney cost for contract review alone. For larger data rooms with 500+ contracts, the number can exceed $350,000.

Where the Time Actually Goes

The 400-hour total breaks down into two fundamentally different types of work: mechanical work and analytical work.

Mechanical work includes reading contracts, locating provisions, extracting specific terms, and formatting findings into memos and schedules. This accounts for roughly 70% of total time, approximately 280 hours. It requires legal knowledge to do correctly, but it does not require legal judgment. It is information processing.

Analytical work includes assessing risk, evaluating materiality, identifying non-standard terms, and making judgment calls about what matters for this specific deal. This accounts for roughly 30% of total time, approximately 120 hours. This is the work that requires experienced attorneys and cannot be automated.

The problem is that most attorney time is spent on the mechanical 70%, leaving insufficient time for the analytical 30%. When associates spend three weeks reading and extracting, they have limited capacity for the deeper analysis that actually protects the client.

The Timeline Cost

The most expensive consequence of manual review is not the direct attorney cost. It is the impact on deal timeline.

A team of 3-4 associates reviewing 300 contracts manually takes 3-4 weeks for the initial review phase, plus 1-2 weeks for summarization, memo drafting, and review cycles. That is 4-6 weeks from data room access to final diligence deliverables.

During those weeks:

• Deal momentum erodes. Counterparties waiting for diligence findings grow impatient. Competing bidders may close faster.
• Late-discovered issues lose negotiating leverage. An assignment restriction found in week 4 that should have been flagged in week 1 leaves less time for negotiation and often results in broader indemnification requests.
• Associate capacity is consumed. Three associates on a four-week review cannot work on other matters. The opportunity cost of locked capacity compounds across a firm's deal pipeline.
• Sampling risk increases. When timelines compress, teams resort to reviewing a subset of contracts rather than the full set. This sampling approach creates risk that 100% coverage would eliminate.

What Changes With AI

AI-assisted contract review does not replace attorneys. It replaces the mechanical 70% of the review workflow: the reading, extracting, and formatting that consumes the majority of time but requires the least judgment.

The practical impact on a 300-contract data room:

Initial extraction: hours instead of weeks. The system reads every contract, classifies it by type, extracts deal-relevant provisions at the clause level, and organizes findings into a structured review interface. What took 225 attorney hours now takes the system minutes to process and attorneys 20-30 hours to review.

Summarization: automated with source links. Every extracted finding links directly to the source document and page. Attorneys review findings and verify against source text rather than reading full contracts and writing summaries from scratch.

Deliverable generation: structured from the start. Because extraction is structured from the beginning, the data flows directly into diligence memos, disclosure schedules, and exception lists. The formatting step that consumed 45 hours becomes a configuration choice.

Total attorney time: 75-120 hours. Primarily spent on reviewing AI-generated findings, assessing risk, exercising judgment on materiality, and preparing the analytical sections of the diligence report. This is the 30% that requires experienced attorneys, now with more time to do it well.

The economics shift from $200,000 and 6 weeks to approximately $50,000-$60,000 and 1-2 weeks. For law firms running multiple transactions simultaneously, the capacity recovery is transformative.

The Compound Effect

The single-transaction economics are compelling. The compound effect across a firm's practice is transformational.

A mid-market M&A practice handling 15-20 transactions per year dedicates roughly 6,000-8,000 attorney hours annually to contract review. Reducing that by 70% recovers 4,000-5,600 hours of associate capacity. That is the equivalent of adding 2-3 full-time associates to the practice without hiring.

Those recovered hours can serve additional deal volume, support deeper analysis on existing deals, or reduce the unsustainable hours that drive associate attrition. In a market where associate recruiting and retention costs continue to rise, the capacity arithmetic matters as much as the direct cost savings.

The question is not whether M&A diligence will adopt AI-assisted contract review. The economics are too compelling. The question is which firms adopt it first and capture the competitive advantage in speed, cost, and analytical depth.

---